Haslemo, Tore

Link to this page

Authority KeyName Variants
cd72312f-3b72-4021-93e5-789f066511ff
  • Haslemo, Tore (3)
Projects

Author's Bibliography

Effect of CYP2D6 genotype on exposure and efficacy of risperidone and aripiprazole: a retrospective, cohort study

Jukić, Marin; Smith, Robert L.; Haslemo, Tore; Molden, Espen; Ingelman-Sundberg, Magnus

(Elsevier Sci Ltd, Oxford, 2019)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Jukić, Marin
AU  - Smith, Robert L.
AU  - Haslemo, Tore
AU  - Molden, Espen
AU  - Ingelman-Sundberg, Magnus
PY  - 2019
UR  - https://farfar.pharmacy.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/3365
AB  - Background The polymorphic CYP2D6 enzyme metabolises the antipsychotic drugs risperidone and aripiprazole to their active metabolites, 9OH-risperidone and dehydroaripiprazole. The aim of this study was to quantify the effect of CYP2D6 genetic variability on risperidone and aripiprazole exposure and treatment in a large patient population. Methods We retrospectively obtained patient data from a routine therapeutic drug monitoring database at the Center for Psychopharmacology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway, between Jan 1, 2005, and Oct 15, 2018. Individuals included in our analyses were CYP2D6-genotyped patients treated with risperidone or aripiprazole. Inclusion criteria for measurement of pharmacokinetic parameters (drug and metabolite serum concentrations) were oral administration of risperidone or aripiprazole, information known about prescribed daily dose and comedications, and aged older than 18 years. Exclusion criteria included polypharmacy with drugs known to be CYP2D6 inhibitors or CYP3A4 inducers or inhibitors. Treatment failure was analysed in all patients treated with risperidone or aripiprazole without these criteria. The first endpoint in our analysis was the metabolism of risperidone to 9OH-risperidone and aripiprazole to dehydroaripiprazole, estimated by the log-transformed ratio between the concentrations of metabolite and parent drug (ie, the metabolic ratio for risperidone [9OH-risperidone]/[risperidone] and the metabolic ratio for aripiprazole [dehydroaripiprazole]/[aripiprazole]). Endpoint two was measurement of drug exposure, quantified by the dose-normalised sum of parent drug and active metabolite serum concentrations (ie, active moiety). The third endpoint of treatment failure was measured as the number of patients switched from risperidone or aripiprazole to another antipsychotic drug within 1 year after the last therapeutic drug monitoring analysis of risperidone or aripiprazole. Patient subgroups were defined by CYP2D6 genotype-determined metaboliser status: poor metabolisers, intermediate metabolisers, normal metabolisers, and ultrarapid metabolisers. ANOVA was used to assess the differences in metabolic ratios, active moieties, and daily doses between individual metaboliser categories, and risperidone and aripiprazole therapeutic failures were compared by logistic regression using the normal metaboliser subgroup as a reference. Findings 1288 risperidone-treated patients and 1334 aripiprazole-treated patients were included in the study, of whom 725 (56%) risperidone-treated and 890 (67%) aripiprazole-treated patients were eligible for the pharmacokinetic analyses. CYP2D6 genotype significantly changed risperidone and aripiprazole metabolism resulting in an approximately 1.6-times and 1.4-times increase in risperidone and aripiprazole active moiety exposure in poor and intermediate metabolisers compared with normal metabolisers, respectively (odds ratios [OR] for the risperidone dose-normalised active moiety concentration 1.568, 95% CI 1.401-1.736, and 1.373, 1.213-1.532; and for the aripiprazole dose-normalised active moiety concentration 1.585, 1.447-1.724, and 1.476, 1.263-1.688, respectively; p lt 0.0001 for all). Compared with doses for normal metabolisers, clinicians reduced daily doses of risperidone and aripiprazole administered to poor metabolisers by 19% (95% CI 5-35, p=0.010) and 15% (95% CI 1-28, p=0.033) respectively. The incidence of switching from risperidone to another antipsychotic was increased in ultrarapid metabolisers (OR 2.934, 95% CI 1.437-5.989, p=0.003) and poor metabolisers (1.874, 1.128-3.112, p=0.015); by contrast, the incidence of switching from aripiprazole to another antipsychotic was not significantly related to CYP2D6 metaboliser status. Interpretation CYP2D6 genotype had a substantial clinical effect on risperidone and aripiprazole exposure and on the therapeutic failure of risperidone. Pre-emptive CYP2D6 genotyping would be valuable for individualising risperidone and aripiprazole dosing and treatment optimisation. Copyright
PB  - Elsevier Sci Ltd, Oxford
T2  - Lancet Psychiatry
T1  - Effect of CYP2D6 genotype on exposure and efficacy of risperidone and aripiprazole: a retrospective, cohort study
VL  - 6
IS  - 5
SP  - 418
EP  - 426
DO  - 10.1016/S2215-0366(19)30088-4
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Jukić, Marin and Smith, Robert L. and Haslemo, Tore and Molden, Espen and Ingelman-Sundberg, Magnus",
year = "2019",
abstract = "Background The polymorphic CYP2D6 enzyme metabolises the antipsychotic drugs risperidone and aripiprazole to their active metabolites, 9OH-risperidone and dehydroaripiprazole. The aim of this study was to quantify the effect of CYP2D6 genetic variability on risperidone and aripiprazole exposure and treatment in a large patient population. Methods We retrospectively obtained patient data from a routine therapeutic drug monitoring database at the Center for Psychopharmacology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway, between Jan 1, 2005, and Oct 15, 2018. Individuals included in our analyses were CYP2D6-genotyped patients treated with risperidone or aripiprazole. Inclusion criteria for measurement of pharmacokinetic parameters (drug and metabolite serum concentrations) were oral administration of risperidone or aripiprazole, information known about prescribed daily dose and comedications, and aged older than 18 years. Exclusion criteria included polypharmacy with drugs known to be CYP2D6 inhibitors or CYP3A4 inducers or inhibitors. Treatment failure was analysed in all patients treated with risperidone or aripiprazole without these criteria. The first endpoint in our analysis was the metabolism of risperidone to 9OH-risperidone and aripiprazole to dehydroaripiprazole, estimated by the log-transformed ratio between the concentrations of metabolite and parent drug (ie, the metabolic ratio for risperidone [9OH-risperidone]/[risperidone] and the metabolic ratio for aripiprazole [dehydroaripiprazole]/[aripiprazole]). Endpoint two was measurement of drug exposure, quantified by the dose-normalised sum of parent drug and active metabolite serum concentrations (ie, active moiety). The third endpoint of treatment failure was measured as the number of patients switched from risperidone or aripiprazole to another antipsychotic drug within 1 year after the last therapeutic drug monitoring analysis of risperidone or aripiprazole. Patient subgroups were defined by CYP2D6 genotype-determined metaboliser status: poor metabolisers, intermediate metabolisers, normal metabolisers, and ultrarapid metabolisers. ANOVA was used to assess the differences in metabolic ratios, active moieties, and daily doses between individual metaboliser categories, and risperidone and aripiprazole therapeutic failures were compared by logistic regression using the normal metaboliser subgroup as a reference. Findings 1288 risperidone-treated patients and 1334 aripiprazole-treated patients were included in the study, of whom 725 (56%) risperidone-treated and 890 (67%) aripiprazole-treated patients were eligible for the pharmacokinetic analyses. CYP2D6 genotype significantly changed risperidone and aripiprazole metabolism resulting in an approximately 1.6-times and 1.4-times increase in risperidone and aripiprazole active moiety exposure in poor and intermediate metabolisers compared with normal metabolisers, respectively (odds ratios [OR] for the risperidone dose-normalised active moiety concentration 1.568, 95% CI 1.401-1.736, and 1.373, 1.213-1.532; and for the aripiprazole dose-normalised active moiety concentration 1.585, 1.447-1.724, and 1.476, 1.263-1.688, respectively; p lt 0.0001 for all). Compared with doses for normal metabolisers, clinicians reduced daily doses of risperidone and aripiprazole administered to poor metabolisers by 19% (95% CI 5-35, p=0.010) and 15% (95% CI 1-28, p=0.033) respectively. The incidence of switching from risperidone to another antipsychotic was increased in ultrarapid metabolisers (OR 2.934, 95% CI 1.437-5.989, p=0.003) and poor metabolisers (1.874, 1.128-3.112, p=0.015); by contrast, the incidence of switching from aripiprazole to another antipsychotic was not significantly related to CYP2D6 metaboliser status. Interpretation CYP2D6 genotype had a substantial clinical effect on risperidone and aripiprazole exposure and on the therapeutic failure of risperidone. Pre-emptive CYP2D6 genotyping would be valuable for individualising risperidone and aripiprazole dosing and treatment optimisation. Copyright",
publisher = "Elsevier Sci Ltd, Oxford",
journal = "Lancet Psychiatry",
title = "Effect of CYP2D6 genotype on exposure and efficacy of risperidone and aripiprazole: a retrospective, cohort study",
volume = "6",
number = "5",
pages = "418-426",
doi = "10.1016/S2215-0366(19)30088-4"
}
Jukić, M., Smith, R. L., Haslemo, T., Molden, E.,& Ingelman-Sundberg, M.. (2019). Effect of CYP2D6 genotype on exposure and efficacy of risperidone and aripiprazole: a retrospective, cohort study. in Lancet Psychiatry
Elsevier Sci Ltd, Oxford., 6(5), 418-426.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(19)30088-4
Jukić M, Smith RL, Haslemo T, Molden E, Ingelman-Sundberg M. Effect of CYP2D6 genotype on exposure and efficacy of risperidone and aripiprazole: a retrospective, cohort study. in Lancet Psychiatry. 2019;6(5):418-426.
doi:10.1016/S2215-0366(19)30088-4 .
Jukić, Marin, Smith, Robert L., Haslemo, Tore, Molden, Espen, Ingelman-Sundberg, Magnus, "Effect of CYP2D6 genotype on exposure and efficacy of risperidone and aripiprazole: a retrospective, cohort study" in Lancet Psychiatry, 6, no. 5 (2019):418-426,
https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(19)30088-4 . .
64
121
52
99

Significantly lower CYP2D6 metabolism measured as the O/N-desmethylvenlafaxine metabolic ratio in carriers of CYP2D6*41 versus CYP2D6*9 or CYP2D6*10: a study on therapeutic drug monitoring data from 1003 genotyped Scandinavian patients

Haslemo, Tore; Eliasson, Erik; Jukić, Marin; Ingelman-Sundberg, Magnus; Molden, Espen

(Wiley, Hoboken, 2019)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Haslemo, Tore
AU  - Eliasson, Erik
AU  - Jukić, Marin
AU  - Ingelman-Sundberg, Magnus
AU  - Molden, Espen
PY  - 2019
UR  - https://farfar.pharmacy.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/3364
AB  - Aims CYP2D6*9, CYP2D6*10 and CYP2D6*41 are the most frequent reduced-function CYP2D6 alleles in Caucasians. Despite lacking in vivo evidence, they are collectively classified with an enzyme activity score of 0.5. Thus, the aim of this study was to compare the functional impact of CYP2D6*9, CYP2D6*10 and CYP2D6*41 on CYP2D6 metabolism in a large patient population. Methods A total of 1003 patients (mainly Caucasians) with data on CYP2D6 genotype and serum concentrations of venlafaxine and metabolites were included from a therapeutic drug monitoring service in Oslo, Norway. The O-desmethyl-to-N-desmethyl-venlafaxine metabolic ratio (MR) was applied as CYP2D6 biomarker and compared (Mann-Whitney) between carriers of CYP2D6*9-10 (merged) and CYP2D6*41, either combined with CYP2D6*1 or non-coding (null) alleles. MR subgroup estimates were obtained by multiple linear regression for calculations of CYP2D6*9-10 and CYP2D6*41 activity scores. Results MR was significantly lower in carriers of CYP2D6*41 than CYP2D6*9-10 (P  lt  0.002). The majority of CYP2D6*41/null carriers (86.7%) had MR in the observed range of CYP2D6null/null carriers compared with the minority of CYP2D6*9-10/null carriers (17.4%). CYP2D6 genotype explained 60.7% of MR variability in the multivariate analysis providing subgroup estimates of 9.54 (95% CI; 7.45-12.20), 3.55 (2.06-6.10), 1.33 (0.87-2.05) and 0.47 (0.35-0.61) in carriers of CYP2D6*1/null (n = 269), CYP2D6*9-10/null (n = 17), CYP2D6*41/null (n = 30) and CYP2D6null/null (n = 95), respectively. Based on these estimates, the calculated activity score of CYP2D6*41 was 0.095 compared to 0.34 for CYP2D6*9-10. Conclusions CYP2D6 metabolism measured as the O/N-desmethylvenlafaxine ratio is significantly lower in Scandinavian carriers of CYP2D6*41 vs. CYP2D6*9-10. Thus, these alleles should be differentiated when classifying CYP2D6 phenotype from genotype.
PB  - Wiley, Hoboken
T2  - British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
T1  - Significantly lower CYP2D6 metabolism measured as the O/N-desmethylvenlafaxine metabolic ratio in carriers of CYP2D6*41 versus CYP2D6*9 or CYP2D6*10: a study on therapeutic drug monitoring data from 1003 genotyped Scandinavian patients
VL  - 85
IS  - 1
SP  - 194
EP  - 201
DO  - 10.1111/bcp.13788
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Haslemo, Tore and Eliasson, Erik and Jukić, Marin and Ingelman-Sundberg, Magnus and Molden, Espen",
year = "2019",
abstract = "Aims CYP2D6*9, CYP2D6*10 and CYP2D6*41 are the most frequent reduced-function CYP2D6 alleles in Caucasians. Despite lacking in vivo evidence, they are collectively classified with an enzyme activity score of 0.5. Thus, the aim of this study was to compare the functional impact of CYP2D6*9, CYP2D6*10 and CYP2D6*41 on CYP2D6 metabolism in a large patient population. Methods A total of 1003 patients (mainly Caucasians) with data on CYP2D6 genotype and serum concentrations of venlafaxine and metabolites were included from a therapeutic drug monitoring service in Oslo, Norway. The O-desmethyl-to-N-desmethyl-venlafaxine metabolic ratio (MR) was applied as CYP2D6 biomarker and compared (Mann-Whitney) between carriers of CYP2D6*9-10 (merged) and CYP2D6*41, either combined with CYP2D6*1 or non-coding (null) alleles. MR subgroup estimates were obtained by multiple linear regression for calculations of CYP2D6*9-10 and CYP2D6*41 activity scores. Results MR was significantly lower in carriers of CYP2D6*41 than CYP2D6*9-10 (P  lt  0.002). The majority of CYP2D6*41/null carriers (86.7%) had MR in the observed range of CYP2D6null/null carriers compared with the minority of CYP2D6*9-10/null carriers (17.4%). CYP2D6 genotype explained 60.7% of MR variability in the multivariate analysis providing subgroup estimates of 9.54 (95% CI; 7.45-12.20), 3.55 (2.06-6.10), 1.33 (0.87-2.05) and 0.47 (0.35-0.61) in carriers of CYP2D6*1/null (n = 269), CYP2D6*9-10/null (n = 17), CYP2D6*41/null (n = 30) and CYP2D6null/null (n = 95), respectively. Based on these estimates, the calculated activity score of CYP2D6*41 was 0.095 compared to 0.34 for CYP2D6*9-10. Conclusions CYP2D6 metabolism measured as the O/N-desmethylvenlafaxine ratio is significantly lower in Scandinavian carriers of CYP2D6*41 vs. CYP2D6*9-10. Thus, these alleles should be differentiated when classifying CYP2D6 phenotype from genotype.",
publisher = "Wiley, Hoboken",
journal = "British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology",
title = "Significantly lower CYP2D6 metabolism measured as the O/N-desmethylvenlafaxine metabolic ratio in carriers of CYP2D6*41 versus CYP2D6*9 or CYP2D6*10: a study on therapeutic drug monitoring data from 1003 genotyped Scandinavian patients",
volume = "85",
number = "1",
pages = "194-201",
doi = "10.1111/bcp.13788"
}
Haslemo, T., Eliasson, E., Jukić, M., Ingelman-Sundberg, M.,& Molden, E.. (2019). Significantly lower CYP2D6 metabolism measured as the O/N-desmethylvenlafaxine metabolic ratio in carriers of CYP2D6*41 versus CYP2D6*9 or CYP2D6*10: a study on therapeutic drug monitoring data from 1003 genotyped Scandinavian patients. in British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Wiley, Hoboken., 85(1), 194-201.
https://doi.org/10.1111/bcp.13788
Haslemo T, Eliasson E, Jukić M, Ingelman-Sundberg M, Molden E. Significantly lower CYP2D6 metabolism measured as the O/N-desmethylvenlafaxine metabolic ratio in carriers of CYP2D6*41 versus CYP2D6*9 or CYP2D6*10: a study on therapeutic drug monitoring data from 1003 genotyped Scandinavian patients. in British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. 2019;85(1):194-201.
doi:10.1111/bcp.13788 .
Haslemo, Tore, Eliasson, Erik, Jukić, Marin, Ingelman-Sundberg, Magnus, Molden, Espen, "Significantly lower CYP2D6 metabolism measured as the O/N-desmethylvenlafaxine metabolic ratio in carriers of CYP2D6*41 versus CYP2D6*9 or CYP2D6*10: a study on therapeutic drug monitoring data from 1003 genotyped Scandinavian patients" in British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 85, no. 1 (2019):194-201,
https://doi.org/10.1111/bcp.13788 . .
1
28
17
26

Impact of CYP2C19 Genotype on Escitalopram Exposure and Therapeutic Failure: A Retrospective Study Based on 2,087 Patients

Jukić, Marin; Haslemo, Tore; Molden, Espen; Ingelman-Sundberg, Magnus

(Amer Psychiatric Publishing, Inc, Washington, 2018)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Jukić, Marin
AU  - Haslemo, Tore
AU  - Molden, Espen
AU  - Ingelman-Sundberg, Magnus
PY  - 2018
UR  - https://farfar.pharmacy.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/3237
AB  - Objective: The antidepressant escitalopram is predominantly metabolized by the polymorphic CYP2C19 enzyme. The authors investigated the effect of CYP2C19 genotype on exposure and therapeutic failure of escitalopram in a large patient population. Method: A total of 4,228 escitalopram serum concentration measurements from 2,087 CYP2C19-genotyped patients 10-30 hours after drug intake were collected retrospectively from the drug monitoring database at Diakonhjemmet Hospital in Oslo. The patients were divided into subgroups based on CYP2C19 genotype: those carrying inactive (CYP2C19Null) and gain-of-function (CYP2C19*17) variant alleles. The between-subgroup differences in escitalopram exposure (endpoint: dose-harmonized serum concentration) and therapeutic failure (endpoint: switching to another antidepressant within 1 year after the last escitalopram measurement) were evaluated by multivariate mixed model and chi-square analysis, respectively. Results: Compared with the CYP2C19*1/*1 group, escitalopram serum concentrations were significantly increased 3.3-fold in the CYP2C19Null/Null group, 1.6-fold in the CYP2C19*Null/*1 group, and 1.4-fold in the CYP2C19Null/*17 group, whereas escitalopram serum concentrations were significantly decreased by 10% in the CYP2C19*1/*17 group and 20% in the CYP1C19*17/*17 group. In comparison to the CYP2C19*1/*1 group, switches from escitalopram to another antidepressant within 1 year were 3.3, 1.6, and 3.0 times more frequent among the CYP2C19Null/Null, CYP2C19*1/*17, and CYP1C19*17/*17 groups, respectively. Conclusions: The CYP2C19 genotype had a substantial impact on exposure and therapeutic failure of escitalopram, as measured by switching of antidepressant therapy. The results support the potential clinical utility of CYP2C19 genotyping for individualization of escitalopram therapy.
PB  - Amer Psychiatric Publishing, Inc, Washington
T2  - American Journal of Psychiatry
T1  - Impact of CYP2C19 Genotype on Escitalopram Exposure and Therapeutic Failure: A Retrospective Study Based on 2,087 Patients
VL  - 175
IS  - 5
SP  - 463
EP  - 470
DO  - 10.1176/appi.ajp.2017.17050550
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Jukić, Marin and Haslemo, Tore and Molden, Espen and Ingelman-Sundberg, Magnus",
year = "2018",
abstract = "Objective: The antidepressant escitalopram is predominantly metabolized by the polymorphic CYP2C19 enzyme. The authors investigated the effect of CYP2C19 genotype on exposure and therapeutic failure of escitalopram in a large patient population. Method: A total of 4,228 escitalopram serum concentration measurements from 2,087 CYP2C19-genotyped patients 10-30 hours after drug intake were collected retrospectively from the drug monitoring database at Diakonhjemmet Hospital in Oslo. The patients were divided into subgroups based on CYP2C19 genotype: those carrying inactive (CYP2C19Null) and gain-of-function (CYP2C19*17) variant alleles. The between-subgroup differences in escitalopram exposure (endpoint: dose-harmonized serum concentration) and therapeutic failure (endpoint: switching to another antidepressant within 1 year after the last escitalopram measurement) were evaluated by multivariate mixed model and chi-square analysis, respectively. Results: Compared with the CYP2C19*1/*1 group, escitalopram serum concentrations were significantly increased 3.3-fold in the CYP2C19Null/Null group, 1.6-fold in the CYP2C19*Null/*1 group, and 1.4-fold in the CYP2C19Null/*17 group, whereas escitalopram serum concentrations were significantly decreased by 10% in the CYP2C19*1/*17 group and 20% in the CYP1C19*17/*17 group. In comparison to the CYP2C19*1/*1 group, switches from escitalopram to another antidepressant within 1 year were 3.3, 1.6, and 3.0 times more frequent among the CYP2C19Null/Null, CYP2C19*1/*17, and CYP1C19*17/*17 groups, respectively. Conclusions: The CYP2C19 genotype had a substantial impact on exposure and therapeutic failure of escitalopram, as measured by switching of antidepressant therapy. The results support the potential clinical utility of CYP2C19 genotyping for individualization of escitalopram therapy.",
publisher = "Amer Psychiatric Publishing, Inc, Washington",
journal = "American Journal of Psychiatry",
title = "Impact of CYP2C19 Genotype on Escitalopram Exposure and Therapeutic Failure: A Retrospective Study Based on 2,087 Patients",
volume = "175",
number = "5",
pages = "463-470",
doi = "10.1176/appi.ajp.2017.17050550"
}
Jukić, M., Haslemo, T., Molden, E.,& Ingelman-Sundberg, M.. (2018). Impact of CYP2C19 Genotype on Escitalopram Exposure and Therapeutic Failure: A Retrospective Study Based on 2,087 Patients. in American Journal of Psychiatry
Amer Psychiatric Publishing, Inc, Washington., 175(5), 463-470.
https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2017.17050550
Jukić M, Haslemo T, Molden E, Ingelman-Sundberg M. Impact of CYP2C19 Genotype on Escitalopram Exposure and Therapeutic Failure: A Retrospective Study Based on 2,087 Patients. in American Journal of Psychiatry. 2018;175(5):463-470.
doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2017.17050550 .
Jukić, Marin, Haslemo, Tore, Molden, Espen, Ingelman-Sundberg, Magnus, "Impact of CYP2C19 Genotype on Escitalopram Exposure and Therapeutic Failure: A Retrospective Study Based on 2,087 Patients" in American Journal of Psychiatry, 175, no. 5 (2018):463-470,
https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2017.17050550 . .
90
148
69
118