Excluding deep venous thrombosis in symptomatic outpatients: is fibrin monomer aid to D-dimer analysis?
Authorized Users Only
2009
Authors
Dopsaj, Violeta
Bogavac-Stanojević, Nataša

Vasić, Dragan
Vukosavljević, Dragana
Martinović, Jelena
Kotur-Stevuljević, Jelena

Spasić, Slavica
Article (Published version)

Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Many studies have investigated the clinical accuracy of the D-dimer test in combination with pretest probability score for deep venous thrombosis (DVT) exclusion. However, few have evaluated its potential when combined with additional markers such as fibrin monomer. The aim of this study was to test the incremental usefulness of fibrin monomer for DVT screening in a bi-marker approach. This was achieved by adding the fibrin monomer to logistic models that included different D-dimer tests. Plasma concentrations of D-dimer and fibrin monomer were measured in 96 outpatients suspected of having DVT and in 76 patients selected from the total patient group according to pretest probability score (termed the DVT-unlikely group). We constructed receiver operating characteristic curves for three different D-dimer assays. Predictive probabilities from different logistic regression models and pair-wise comparisons of the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCs) were calculate...d without and with fibrin monomer included in the models. For all three D-dimer assays, the AUCs were higher in the DVT-unlikely group compared with AUCs in the total patient group [but the differences were without statistical significance (P>0.05)]. The calculated fibrin monomer AUCs (0.724 in the total patient group and 0.683 in the DVT-unlikely group) were lower than the D-dimer tests' AUCs. The AUCs obtained from logistic regression models that included the three D-dimer tests in the total patient group and the DVT-unlikely group were significantly increased when fibrin monomer was included in the model to such an extent that the AUCs for one of them indicated outstanding discriminative abilities. Simultaneous D-dimer and fibrin monomer determination provides a more valuable approximation for DVT exclusion compared with just D-dimer analysis. Bearing in mind that the fibrin monomer assay is now both more practical and more suited for routine clinical use, fibrin monomer determination could be a more commonly used parameter together with D-dimer and pretest probability score for DVT diagnosis in the future. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 20:546-551
Keywords:
D-dimer / deep venous thrombosis / fibrin monomer / pretest-probability score / receiver operating characteristic curveSource:
Blood Coagulation & Fibrinolysis, 2009, 20, 7, 546-551Publisher:
- Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia
Funding / projects:
- bioMerieux
DOI: 10.1097/MBC.0b013e32832e0605
ISSN: 0957-5235
PubMed: 19710608
WoS: 000270764800010
Scopus: 2-s2.0-70349845895
Collections
Institution/Community
PharmacyTY - JOUR AU - Dopsaj, Violeta AU - Bogavac-Stanojević, Nataša AU - Vasić, Dragan AU - Vukosavljević, Dragana AU - Martinović, Jelena AU - Kotur-Stevuljević, Jelena AU - Spasić, Slavica PY - 2009 UR - https://farfar.pharmacy.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1180 AB - Many studies have investigated the clinical accuracy of the D-dimer test in combination with pretest probability score for deep venous thrombosis (DVT) exclusion. However, few have evaluated its potential when combined with additional markers such as fibrin monomer. The aim of this study was to test the incremental usefulness of fibrin monomer for DVT screening in a bi-marker approach. This was achieved by adding the fibrin monomer to logistic models that included different D-dimer tests. Plasma concentrations of D-dimer and fibrin monomer were measured in 96 outpatients suspected of having DVT and in 76 patients selected from the total patient group according to pretest probability score (termed the DVT-unlikely group). We constructed receiver operating characteristic curves for three different D-dimer assays. Predictive probabilities from different logistic regression models and pair-wise comparisons of the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCs) were calculated without and with fibrin monomer included in the models. For all three D-dimer assays, the AUCs were higher in the DVT-unlikely group compared with AUCs in the total patient group [but the differences were without statistical significance (P>0.05)]. The calculated fibrin monomer AUCs (0.724 in the total patient group and 0.683 in the DVT-unlikely group) were lower than the D-dimer tests' AUCs. The AUCs obtained from logistic regression models that included the three D-dimer tests in the total patient group and the DVT-unlikely group were significantly increased when fibrin monomer was included in the model to such an extent that the AUCs for one of them indicated outstanding discriminative abilities. Simultaneous D-dimer and fibrin monomer determination provides a more valuable approximation for DVT exclusion compared with just D-dimer analysis. Bearing in mind that the fibrin monomer assay is now both more practical and more suited for routine clinical use, fibrin monomer determination could be a more commonly used parameter together with D-dimer and pretest probability score for DVT diagnosis in the future. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 20:546-551 PB - Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia T2 - Blood Coagulation & Fibrinolysis T1 - Excluding deep venous thrombosis in symptomatic outpatients: is fibrin monomer aid to D-dimer analysis? VL - 20 IS - 7 SP - 546 EP - 551 DO - 10.1097/MBC.0b013e32832e0605 ER -
@article{ author = "Dopsaj, Violeta and Bogavac-Stanojević, Nataša and Vasić, Dragan and Vukosavljević, Dragana and Martinović, Jelena and Kotur-Stevuljević, Jelena and Spasić, Slavica", year = "2009", abstract = "Many studies have investigated the clinical accuracy of the D-dimer test in combination with pretest probability score for deep venous thrombosis (DVT) exclusion. However, few have evaluated its potential when combined with additional markers such as fibrin monomer. The aim of this study was to test the incremental usefulness of fibrin monomer for DVT screening in a bi-marker approach. This was achieved by adding the fibrin monomer to logistic models that included different D-dimer tests. Plasma concentrations of D-dimer and fibrin monomer were measured in 96 outpatients suspected of having DVT and in 76 patients selected from the total patient group according to pretest probability score (termed the DVT-unlikely group). We constructed receiver operating characteristic curves for three different D-dimer assays. Predictive probabilities from different logistic regression models and pair-wise comparisons of the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCs) were calculated without and with fibrin monomer included in the models. For all three D-dimer assays, the AUCs were higher in the DVT-unlikely group compared with AUCs in the total patient group [but the differences were without statistical significance (P>0.05)]. The calculated fibrin monomer AUCs (0.724 in the total patient group and 0.683 in the DVT-unlikely group) were lower than the D-dimer tests' AUCs. The AUCs obtained from logistic regression models that included the three D-dimer tests in the total patient group and the DVT-unlikely group were significantly increased when fibrin monomer was included in the model to such an extent that the AUCs for one of them indicated outstanding discriminative abilities. Simultaneous D-dimer and fibrin monomer determination provides a more valuable approximation for DVT exclusion compared with just D-dimer analysis. Bearing in mind that the fibrin monomer assay is now both more practical and more suited for routine clinical use, fibrin monomer determination could be a more commonly used parameter together with D-dimer and pretest probability score for DVT diagnosis in the future. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 20:546-551", publisher = "Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia", journal = "Blood Coagulation & Fibrinolysis", title = "Excluding deep venous thrombosis in symptomatic outpatients: is fibrin monomer aid to D-dimer analysis?", volume = "20", number = "7", pages = "546-551", doi = "10.1097/MBC.0b013e32832e0605" }
Dopsaj, V., Bogavac-Stanojević, N., Vasić, D., Vukosavljević, D., Martinović, J., Kotur-Stevuljević, J.,& Spasić, S.. (2009). Excluding deep venous thrombosis in symptomatic outpatients: is fibrin monomer aid to D-dimer analysis?. in Blood Coagulation & Fibrinolysis Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia., 20(7), 546-551. https://doi.org/10.1097/MBC.0b013e32832e0605
Dopsaj V, Bogavac-Stanojević N, Vasić D, Vukosavljević D, Martinović J, Kotur-Stevuljević J, Spasić S. Excluding deep venous thrombosis in symptomatic outpatients: is fibrin monomer aid to D-dimer analysis?. in Blood Coagulation & Fibrinolysis. 2009;20(7):546-551. doi:10.1097/MBC.0b013e32832e0605 .
Dopsaj, Violeta, Bogavac-Stanojević, Nataša, Vasić, Dragan, Vukosavljević, Dragana, Martinović, Jelena, Kotur-Stevuljević, Jelena, Spasić, Slavica, "Excluding deep venous thrombosis in symptomatic outpatients: is fibrin monomer aid to D-dimer analysis?" in Blood Coagulation & Fibrinolysis, 20, no. 7 (2009):546-551, https://doi.org/10.1097/MBC.0b013e32832e0605 . .