FarFaR - Pharmacy Repository
University of Belgrade, Faculty of Pharmacy
    • English
    • Српски
    • Српски (Serbia)
  • English 
    • English
    • Serbian (Cyrillic)
    • Serbian (Latin)
  • Login
View Item 
  •   FarFaR
  • Pharmacy
  • Radovi istraživača / Researchers’ publications
  • View Item
  •   FarFaR
  • Pharmacy
  • Radovi istraživača / Researchers’ publications
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Trace Element Analysis and Pattern Recognition Techniques in Classification of Wine from Central Balkan Countries

No Thumbnail
Authors
Ražić, Slavica
Onjia, Antonije
Article (Published version)
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
Chemical analysis in conjunction with multivariate data evaluation methods was used to study elemental profiles and geographical origin of wines from central Balkan countries (Serbia Montenegro and Macedonia) Nine elements (Na K Mg Ca Fe Mn Zn Cu and Pb) chosen as chemical descriptors were analyzed in 41 commercial wine samples Unsupervised pattern recognition methods principal component analysis (PCA) and factor analysis identified the main factors controlling the data variability while the application of hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA) highlighted a differentiation between sample groups belonging to different variable inputs Three PCs were shown to be the most significant together accounting for 70 8% of the total variance Supervised pattern recognition methods linear discriminant analysis (LDA) k nearest neighbor (kNN) soft independent modeling of class analogy (SIMCA) and artificial neural network (ANN) applied to the classification of wine samples demonstrated different recogn...ition and prediction abilities The recognition rate for LDA was 97 6% and the percentage of classification obtained by kNN SIMCA and ANN was 100% However the LDA method produced the best prediction rate of 83 3% whereas kNN SIMCA and ANN gave much lower percentages of correctly classified samples at 72 2 61 1 and 55 6% respectively Trace elements seem to be suitable descriptors for wine samples studied by classification methods since their concentrations comprising both natural and other sources of influence are attributed to grapegrowing and winemaking sites Comparison of pattern recognition methods reveals the difference in their classification power

Keywords:
AAS / PCA / kNN / SIMCA / ANN / metals
Source:
American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 2010, 61, 4, 506-511
Publisher:
  • Amer Soc Enology Viticulture, Davis
Funding / projects:
  • Nove metode i tehnike za separaciju i specijaciju hemijskih elemenata u tragovima, organskih supstanci i radionuklida i identifikaciju njihovih izvora (RS-142039)

DOI: 10.5344/ajev.2010.10002

ISSN: 0002-9254

WoS: 000285496600009

Scopus: 2-s2.0-78649974982
[ Google Scholar ]
21
19
URI
https://farfar.pharmacy.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1363
Collections
  • Radovi istraživača / Researchers’ publications
Institution/Community
Pharmacy
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Ražić, Slavica
AU  - Onjia, Antonije
PY  - 2010
UR  - https://farfar.pharmacy.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1363
AB  - Chemical analysis in conjunction with multivariate data evaluation methods was used to study elemental profiles and geographical origin of wines from central Balkan countries (Serbia Montenegro and Macedonia) Nine elements (Na K Mg Ca Fe Mn Zn Cu and Pb) chosen as chemical descriptors were analyzed in 41 commercial wine samples Unsupervised pattern recognition methods principal component analysis (PCA) and factor analysis identified the main factors controlling the data variability while the application of hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA) highlighted a differentiation between sample groups belonging to different variable inputs Three PCs were shown to be the most significant together accounting for 70 8% of the total variance Supervised pattern recognition methods linear discriminant analysis (LDA) k nearest neighbor (kNN) soft independent modeling of class analogy (SIMCA) and artificial neural network (ANN) applied to the classification of wine samples demonstrated different recognition and prediction abilities The recognition rate for LDA was 97 6% and the percentage of classification obtained by kNN SIMCA and ANN was 100% However the LDA method produced the best prediction rate of 83 3% whereas kNN SIMCA and ANN gave much lower percentages of correctly classified samples at 72 2 61 1 and 55 6% respectively Trace elements seem to be suitable descriptors for wine samples studied by classification methods since their concentrations comprising both natural and other sources of influence are attributed to grapegrowing and winemaking sites Comparison of pattern recognition methods reveals the difference in their classification power
PB  - Amer Soc Enology Viticulture, Davis
T2  - American Journal of Enology and Viticulture
T1  - Trace Element Analysis and Pattern Recognition Techniques in Classification of Wine from Central Balkan Countries
VL  - 61
IS  - 4
SP  - 506
EP  - 511
DO  - 10.5344/ajev.2010.10002
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Ražić, Slavica and Onjia, Antonije",
year = "2010",
abstract = "Chemical analysis in conjunction with multivariate data evaluation methods was used to study elemental profiles and geographical origin of wines from central Balkan countries (Serbia Montenegro and Macedonia) Nine elements (Na K Mg Ca Fe Mn Zn Cu and Pb) chosen as chemical descriptors were analyzed in 41 commercial wine samples Unsupervised pattern recognition methods principal component analysis (PCA) and factor analysis identified the main factors controlling the data variability while the application of hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA) highlighted a differentiation between sample groups belonging to different variable inputs Three PCs were shown to be the most significant together accounting for 70 8% of the total variance Supervised pattern recognition methods linear discriminant analysis (LDA) k nearest neighbor (kNN) soft independent modeling of class analogy (SIMCA) and artificial neural network (ANN) applied to the classification of wine samples demonstrated different recognition and prediction abilities The recognition rate for LDA was 97 6% and the percentage of classification obtained by kNN SIMCA and ANN was 100% However the LDA method produced the best prediction rate of 83 3% whereas kNN SIMCA and ANN gave much lower percentages of correctly classified samples at 72 2 61 1 and 55 6% respectively Trace elements seem to be suitable descriptors for wine samples studied by classification methods since their concentrations comprising both natural and other sources of influence are attributed to grapegrowing and winemaking sites Comparison of pattern recognition methods reveals the difference in their classification power",
publisher = "Amer Soc Enology Viticulture, Davis",
journal = "American Journal of Enology and Viticulture",
title = "Trace Element Analysis and Pattern Recognition Techniques in Classification of Wine from Central Balkan Countries",
volume = "61",
number = "4",
pages = "506-511",
doi = "10.5344/ajev.2010.10002"
}
Ražić, S.,& Onjia, A.. (2010). Trace Element Analysis and Pattern Recognition Techniques in Classification of Wine from Central Balkan Countries. in American Journal of Enology and Viticulture
Amer Soc Enology Viticulture, Davis., 61(4), 506-511.
https://doi.org/10.5344/ajev.2010.10002
Ražić S, Onjia A. Trace Element Analysis and Pattern Recognition Techniques in Classification of Wine from Central Balkan Countries. in American Journal of Enology and Viticulture. 2010;61(4):506-511.
doi:10.5344/ajev.2010.10002 .
Ražić, Slavica, Onjia, Antonije, "Trace Element Analysis and Pattern Recognition Techniques in Classification of Wine from Central Balkan Countries" in American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 61, no. 4 (2010):506-511,
https://doi.org/10.5344/ajev.2010.10002 . .

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About FarFaR - Pharmacy Repository | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB
 

 

All of DSpaceCommunitiesAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis institutionAuthorsTitlesSubjects

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About FarFaR - Pharmacy Repository | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB