Приказ основних података о документу

dc.creatorOdalović, Marina
dc.creatorLakić, Dragana
dc.creatorTadić, Ivana
dc.creatorTasić, Ljiljana
dc.creatorPetrova, Guenka
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-02T11:32:37Z
dc.date.available2019-09-02T11:32:37Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.issn1098-3015
dc.identifier.urihttps://farfar.pharmacy.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1852
dc.description.abstractObjectives: Different types of labour need different resources. Therefore, different costs could be expected. Objectives of this study were to determine if sig- nificant differences in costs of different type of labour and methods of delivery exist and to determine factors related to estimated costs. The costs of spontaneous labour with vaginal delivery (SVD), induced labour with vaginal delivery (IVD), and planned C-section (CS) without labour were estimated. MethOds: Retrospective, population- based study was conducted for the period January – December, 2010. Health Insurance Fund of Republic of Serbia (HIFRS) database was used as a data source. Direct medical costs of mother/newborn pair were estimated. Costs were observed from the perspec- tive of HIFRS and expressed in European Monetary Unit (EUR). Results: A total of 99 women were selected for the study sample; average age was 30.55±5.42 years. The majority of women (46.5%) had SVD, 28.3% had IVD and 25.2% had CS. Women with CS were longer hospitalized compared to women with SVD and IVD (8.52±4.74 vs. 4.59±2.89 and 5.04±3.01 days, respectively, p<0.05). Newborns after CS were longer hos- pitalized compared to newborns after SVD and IVD (5.76±2.20 vs. 4.0±2.07 (p<0.05) and 5.14±3.39 (p>0.05)). Majority of women (88.0%) and children (80.0%) after CS were hos- pitalized at semi-intensive and/or intensive care unites. The average costs of delivery, regardless of the method, were 417.02±284.14 EUR. The costs of C-section were higher compare to SVD (640.18±240.04 vs. 243.27±131.70 EUR, p<0.05) and IVD (640.18±240.04 vs. 497.10±327.91 EUR, p>0.05). cOnclusiOns: The highest costs of labour in Serbia were costs of planned CS. Longer maternal/newborns hospital stay and more frequent hospitalization at semi-intensive and/or intensive care unites after CS were leading factors of estimated high costs. Considering high costs of CS, it is neces- sary to review such clinical practice for the purpose of optimizing the use of resources.
dc.publisherElsevier Inc.
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.sourceValue in Health
dc.titleCosts of alternative methods of child delivery in Serbiaen
dc.typeconferenceObject
dc.rights.licenseARR
dcterms.abstractОдаловић, Марина; Лакић, Драгана; Тасић, Љиљана; Тадић, Ивана; Петрова, Гуенка;
dc.citation.volume16
dc.citation.issue7
dc.citation.spageA332
dc.citation.epageA332
dc.citation.other16(7): -
dc.citation.rankaM21
dc.description.otherISPOR 16th Annual European Congress and 4th Latin America Conference Research Abstracts
dc.identifier.wos000326247600051
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jval.2013.08.059
dc.identifier.fulltexthttp://farfar.pharmacy.bg.ac.rs/bitstream/id/10195/Costs_of_Alternative_pub_2013.pdf
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion


Документи

Thumbnail

Овај документ се појављује у следећим колекцијама

Приказ основних података о документу