Prikaz osnovnih podataka o dokumentu

dc.creatorJovičić, Snežana
dc.creatorSiodmiak, Joanna
dc.creatorAlcorta, Marta Duque
dc.creatorKittel, Maximillian
dc.creatorOosterhuis, Wytze
dc.creatorAakre, Kristin Moberg
dc.creatorJørgensen, Per
dc.creatorPalicka, Vladimir
dc.creatorKutt, Marge
dc.creatorAnttonen, Mikko
dc.creatorGeorgieva Velizarova, Mileva
dc.creatorMarc, Jania
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-03T12:10:10Z
dc.date.available2021-03-03T12:10:10Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.issn1434-6621
dc.identifier.urihttps://farfar.pharmacy.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/3789
dc.description.abstractThere are many mobile health applications (apps) now available and some that use in some way laboratory medicine data. Among them, patient-oriented are of the lowest content quality. The aim of this study was to compare the opinions of non-laboratory medicine professionals (NLMP) with those of laboratory medicine specialists (LMS) and define the benchmarks for quality assessment of laboratory medicine apps. Twenty-five volunteers from six European countries evaluated 16 selected patient-oriented apps. Participants were 20-60 years old, 44% were females, with different educational degrees, and no professional involvement in laboratory medicine. Each participant completed a questionnaire based on the Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS) and the System Usability Scale, as previously used for rating the app quality by LMS. The responses from the two groups were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test and Spearman correlation. The median total score of NLMP app evaluation was 2.73 out of 5 (IQR 0.95) compared to 3.78 (IQR 1.05) by the LMS. All scores were statistically significantly lower in the NLMP group (p<0.05), except for the item Information quality (p=0.1631). The suggested benchmarks for a useful appear: increasing awareness of the importance and delivering an understanding of persons' own laboratory test results; understandable terminology; easy to use; appropriate graphic design, and trustworthy information. NLMP' evaluation confirmed the low utility of currently available laboratory medicine apps. A reliable app should contain trustworthy and understandable information. The appearance of an app should be fit for purpose and easy to use.
dc.publisherDe Gruyter Open Ltd
dc.rightsrestrictedAccess
dc.sourceClinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
dc.subjectbenchmarking
dc.subjectlaboratory medicine
dc.subjectMobile Application Rating Scale (MARS)
dc.subjectmobile health applications (apps)
dc.subjectsmartphone
dc.subjectusability
dc.titleQuality benchmarking of smartphone laboratory medicine applications: Comparison of laboratory medicine specialists' and non-laboratory medicine professionals' evaluation
dc.typearticle
dc.rights.licenseARR
dcterms.abstractМарц, Јаниа; Јовичић, Снежана; Сиодмиак, Јоанна; Палицка, Владимир; Кутт, Марге; Aлцорта, Марта Дуqуе; Киттел, Маxимиллиан; Оостерхуис, Wyтзе; Aнттонен, Микко; Aакре, Кристин Моберг; Јøргенсен, Пер; Георгиева Велизарова, Милева;
dc.citation.rankaM21
dc.identifier.wos000628828900020
dc.identifier.doi10.1515/cclm-2020-0869
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85100905409
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion


Dokumenti

Thumbnail

Ovaj dokument se pojavljuje u sledećim kolekcijama

Prikaz osnovnih podataka o dokumentu