FarFaR - Pharmacy Repository
University of Belgrade, Faculty of Pharmacy
    • English
    • Српски
    • Српски (Serbia)
  • English 
    • English
    • Serbian (Cyrillic)
    • Serbian (Latin)
  • Login
View Item 
  •   FarFaR
  • Pharmacy
  • Radovi istraživača / Researchers’ publications
  • View Item
  •   FarFaR
  • Pharmacy
  • Radovi istraživača / Researchers’ publications
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Efficient Development of Green Emulsifier/Emollient-Based Emulsion Vehicles: From RSM Optimal Experimental Design to Abridged In Vivo Assessment

Thumbnail
2023
Efficient_Development_of_pub_2023.pdf (5.187Mb)
Authors
Vukašinović, Mila
Savić, Sanela
Cekić, Nebojša
Ilić, Tanja
Pantelić, Ivana
Savić, Snežana
Article (Published version)
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
Since natural-origin, sustainable ingredients are preferred by modern consumers, novel emulsifiers and emollients keep entering the market. This study hypothesizes that a combination of in silico, instrumental tools and simplified sensory studies could be used to efficiently characterize emulsions in a shorter timeframe. A total of 22 rather simple o/w emulsions were prepared by a time/energy-saving emulsification process. A natural mixed emulsifier (Lauryl Glucoside/Myristyl Glucoside/Polyglyceryl-6 Laurate) and two emollients (both with INCI name C15–19 Alkane) were used. The performed D-optimal experimental design within the response surface method (RSM) significantly narrowed down the number of samples about to enter the stage of texture, friction and sensory studies to the samples comprising 30% of a respective Emogreen emollient and 2% or 3% of the emulsifier. The sample comprising 2% emulsifier/30% Emogreen® L15 showed significantly higher firmness (42.12 mN) when compared to th...e one with 2% emulsifier/30% Emogreen® L19 (33.62 mN), which was somewhat unexpected considering the emollients’ inherent viscosity values (4.5 mPa·s for L15 and 9 mPa·s for L19). The sample with 2% emulsifier/30% Emogreen® L19 managed to maintain the lowest friction, while the one with 3% emulsifier/30% Emogreen® L19 released its full lubricating potential in the second part of the measurement (30–60 s). The obtained results revealed the strengths and weaknesses of each formulation, narrowing down their possible applications in the early development stage.

Keywords:
design of experiments / C15–19 Alkane / Lauryl Glucoside / Myristyl Glucoside and Polyglyceryl-6 Laurate / rheology / skin friction / texture analysis
Source:
Pharmaceutics, 2023, 15, 2
Publisher:
  • MDPI
Funding / projects:
  • Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development, Republic of Serbia, Grant no. 200161 (University of Belgrade, Faculty of Pharmacy) (RS-200161)
  • Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development, Republic of Serbia, Grant no. 200133 (Univeristy of Niš, Faculty of Technology, Leskovac) (RS-200133)

DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15020486

ISSN: 1999-4923

PubMed: 36839806

Scopus: 2-s2.0-85149120638
[ Google Scholar ]
URI
https://farfar.pharmacy.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/4517
Collections
  • Radovi istraživača / Researchers’ publications
Institution/Community
Pharmacy
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Vukašinović, Mila
AU  - Savić, Sanela
AU  - Cekić, Nebojša
AU  - Ilić, Tanja
AU  - Pantelić, Ivana
AU  - Savić, Snežana
PY  - 2023
UR  - https://farfar.pharmacy.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/4517
AB  - Since natural-origin, sustainable ingredients are preferred by modern consumers, novel emulsifiers and emollients keep entering the market. This study hypothesizes that a combination of in silico, instrumental tools and simplified sensory studies could be used to efficiently characterize emulsions in a shorter timeframe. A total of 22 rather simple o/w emulsions were prepared by a time/energy-saving emulsification process. A natural mixed emulsifier (Lauryl Glucoside/Myristyl Glucoside/Polyglyceryl-6 Laurate) and two emollients (both with INCI name C15–19 Alkane) were used. The performed D-optimal experimental design within the response surface method (RSM) significantly narrowed down the number of samples about to enter the stage of texture, friction and sensory studies to the samples comprising 30% of a respective Emogreen emollient and 2% or 3% of the emulsifier. The sample comprising 2% emulsifier/30% Emogreen® L15 showed significantly higher firmness (42.12 mN) when compared to the one with 2% emulsifier/30% Emogreen® L19 (33.62 mN), which was somewhat unexpected considering the emollients’ inherent viscosity values (4.5 mPa·s for L15 and 9 mPa·s for L19). The sample with 2% emulsifier/30% Emogreen® L19 managed to maintain the lowest friction, while the one with 3% emulsifier/30% Emogreen® L19 released its full lubricating potential in the second part of the measurement (30–60 s). The obtained results revealed the strengths and weaknesses of each formulation, narrowing down their possible applications in the early development stage.
PB  - MDPI
T2  - Pharmaceutics
T1  - Efficient Development of Green Emulsifier/Emollient-Based Emulsion Vehicles: From RSM Optimal Experimental Design to Abridged In Vivo Assessment
VL  - 15
IS  - 2
DO  - 10.3390/pharmaceutics15020486
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Vukašinović, Mila and Savić, Sanela and Cekić, Nebojša and Ilić, Tanja and Pantelić, Ivana and Savić, Snežana",
year = "2023",
abstract = "Since natural-origin, sustainable ingredients are preferred by modern consumers, novel emulsifiers and emollients keep entering the market. This study hypothesizes that a combination of in silico, instrumental tools and simplified sensory studies could be used to efficiently characterize emulsions in a shorter timeframe. A total of 22 rather simple o/w emulsions were prepared by a time/energy-saving emulsification process. A natural mixed emulsifier (Lauryl Glucoside/Myristyl Glucoside/Polyglyceryl-6 Laurate) and two emollients (both with INCI name C15–19 Alkane) were used. The performed D-optimal experimental design within the response surface method (RSM) significantly narrowed down the number of samples about to enter the stage of texture, friction and sensory studies to the samples comprising 30% of a respective Emogreen emollient and 2% or 3% of the emulsifier. The sample comprising 2% emulsifier/30% Emogreen® L15 showed significantly higher firmness (42.12 mN) when compared to the one with 2% emulsifier/30% Emogreen® L19 (33.62 mN), which was somewhat unexpected considering the emollients’ inherent viscosity values (4.5 mPa·s for L15 and 9 mPa·s for L19). The sample with 2% emulsifier/30% Emogreen® L19 managed to maintain the lowest friction, while the one with 3% emulsifier/30% Emogreen® L19 released its full lubricating potential in the second part of the measurement (30–60 s). The obtained results revealed the strengths and weaknesses of each formulation, narrowing down their possible applications in the early development stage.",
publisher = "MDPI",
journal = "Pharmaceutics",
title = "Efficient Development of Green Emulsifier/Emollient-Based Emulsion Vehicles: From RSM Optimal Experimental Design to Abridged In Vivo Assessment",
volume = "15",
number = "2",
doi = "10.3390/pharmaceutics15020486"
}
Vukašinović, M., Savić, S., Cekić, N., Ilić, T., Pantelić, I.,& Savić, S.. (2023). Efficient Development of Green Emulsifier/Emollient-Based Emulsion Vehicles: From RSM Optimal Experimental Design to Abridged In Vivo Assessment. in Pharmaceutics
MDPI., 15(2).
https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics15020486
Vukašinović M, Savić S, Cekić N, Ilić T, Pantelić I, Savić S. Efficient Development of Green Emulsifier/Emollient-Based Emulsion Vehicles: From RSM Optimal Experimental Design to Abridged In Vivo Assessment. in Pharmaceutics. 2023;15(2).
doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics15020486 .
Vukašinović, Mila, Savić, Sanela, Cekić, Nebojša, Ilić, Tanja, Pantelić, Ivana, Savić, Snežana, "Efficient Development of Green Emulsifier/Emollient-Based Emulsion Vehicles: From RSM Optimal Experimental Design to Abridged In Vivo Assessment" in Pharmaceutics, 15, no. 2 (2023),
https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics15020486 . .

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About FarFaR - Pharmacy Repository | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB
 

 

All of DSpaceCommunitiesAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis institutionAuthorsTitlesSubjects

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About FarFaR - Pharmacy Repository | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB