FarFaR - Pharmacy Repository
University of Belgrade, Faculty of Pharmacy
    • English
    • Српски
    • Српски (Serbia)
  • English 
    • English
    • Serbian (Cyrillic)
    • Serbian (Latin)
  • Login
View Item 
  •   FarFaR
  • Pharmacy
  • Radovi istraživača / Researchers’ publications
  • View Item
  •   FarFaR
  • Pharmacy
  • Radovi istraživača / Researchers’ publications
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Chromatographic and computational lipophilicity assessment of novel antibiofilm agents

Authorized Users Only
2020
Authors
Krmar, Jovana
Protić, Ana
Đajić, Nevena
Zečević, Mira
Otašević, Biljana
Article (Published version)
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
In this study, lipophilicity of five newly designed molecules with antibiofilm properties was estimated for the first time. The overall goal of lipophilicity evaluation in lead generation phase is to decrease the traditionally high attrition rates for compounds entering clinical trials. Lipophilicity was assessed using RP-HPLC and in silico methods. Chromatographic analyses were performed on BDS Thermo Scientific Hypersil C18 and Phenomenex Kinetex C8 columns with mobile phase consisting of acetonitrile and 20mmol/L ammonium-acetate solution in different ratios. Retention data was used to derivatize the lipophilicity estimates logkw, S and u0: Computational substructurebased and property-based methods were employed to calculate the logP, logD, milogP, AlogP, XlogP2, XlogP3, AlogPs, AClogP and MlogP descriptors. Due to the incongruent trends of increasing hydrophobicity observed among the scales, the Sum of Ranking Differences was used to fairly evaluate the prediction ability... of each method. This test unambiguously recognized SðC18Þ, AlogP and XlogP2 as the best lipophilicity measures. By virtue of the respective scales, compound denoted as DIRL PIP was identified as the most lipophilic one. Out of concern related to the DIRL PIP’s anticipated toxicity, less hydrophobic MHK 9a should be subjected to the further drug development.

Keywords:
Antibiofilm agents / in silico / lipophilicity / RP-HPLC / Sum of Ranking Differences
Source:
Journal of Liquid Chromatography & Related Technologies, 2020, 43, 15-16, 615-623
Publisher:
  • Taylor & Francis Inc.
Funding / projects:
  • Synthesis, Quantitative Structure and Activity Relationship, Physico-Chemical Characterisation and Analysis of Pharmacologically Active Substances (RS-172033)

DOI: 10.1080/10826076.2020.1777154

ISSN: 1082-6076

WoS: 000554670800001

Scopus: 2-s2.0-85087144122
[ Google Scholar ]
2
URI
https://farfar.pharmacy.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/4902
Collections
  • Radovi istraživača / Researchers’ publications
Institution/Community
Pharmacy
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Krmar, Jovana
AU  - Protić, Ana
AU  - Đajić, Nevena
AU  - Zečević, Mira
AU  - Otašević, Biljana
PY  - 2020
UR  - https://farfar.pharmacy.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/4902
AB  - In this study, lipophilicity of five newly designed molecules with antibiofilm properties was estimated
for the first time. The overall goal of lipophilicity evaluation in lead generation phase is to
decrease the traditionally high attrition rates for compounds entering clinical trials. Lipophilicity
was assessed using RP-HPLC and in silico methods. Chromatographic analyses were performed on
BDS Thermo Scientific Hypersil C18 and Phenomenex Kinetex C8 columns with mobile phase consisting
of acetonitrile and 20mmol/L ammonium-acetate solution in different ratios. Retention data
was used to derivatize the lipophilicity estimates logkw, S and u0: Computational substructurebased
and property-based methods were employed to calculate the logP, logD, milogP, AlogP,
XlogP2, XlogP3, AlogPs, AClogP and MlogP descriptors. Due to the incongruent trends of increasing
hydrophobicity observed among the scales, the Sum of Ranking Differences was used to fairly
evaluate the prediction ability of each method. This test unambiguously recognized SðC18Þ, AlogP
and XlogP2 as the best lipophilicity measures. By virtue of the respective scales, compound
denoted as DIRL PIP was identified as the most lipophilic one. Out of concern related to the DIRL
PIP’s anticipated toxicity, less hydrophobic MHK 9a should be subjected to the further drug development.
PB  - Taylor & Francis Inc.
T2  - Journal of Liquid Chromatography & Related Technologies
T1  - Chromatographic and computational lipophilicity assessment of novel antibiofilm agents
VL  - 43
IS  - 15-16
SP  - 615
EP  - 623
DO  - 10.1080/10826076.2020.1777154
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Krmar, Jovana and Protić, Ana and Đajić, Nevena and Zečević, Mira and Otašević, Biljana",
year = "2020",
abstract = "In this study, lipophilicity of five newly designed molecules with antibiofilm properties was estimated
for the first time. The overall goal of lipophilicity evaluation in lead generation phase is to
decrease the traditionally high attrition rates for compounds entering clinical trials. Lipophilicity
was assessed using RP-HPLC and in silico methods. Chromatographic analyses were performed on
BDS Thermo Scientific Hypersil C18 and Phenomenex Kinetex C8 columns with mobile phase consisting
of acetonitrile and 20mmol/L ammonium-acetate solution in different ratios. Retention data
was used to derivatize the lipophilicity estimates logkw, S and u0: Computational substructurebased
and property-based methods were employed to calculate the logP, logD, milogP, AlogP,
XlogP2, XlogP3, AlogPs, AClogP and MlogP descriptors. Due to the incongruent trends of increasing
hydrophobicity observed among the scales, the Sum of Ranking Differences was used to fairly
evaluate the prediction ability of each method. This test unambiguously recognized SðC18Þ, AlogP
and XlogP2 as the best lipophilicity measures. By virtue of the respective scales, compound
denoted as DIRL PIP was identified as the most lipophilic one. Out of concern related to the DIRL
PIP’s anticipated toxicity, less hydrophobic MHK 9a should be subjected to the further drug development.",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis Inc.",
journal = "Journal of Liquid Chromatography & Related Technologies",
title = "Chromatographic and computational lipophilicity assessment of novel antibiofilm agents",
volume = "43",
number = "15-16",
pages = "615-623",
doi = "10.1080/10826076.2020.1777154"
}
Krmar, J., Protić, A., Đajić, N., Zečević, M.,& Otašević, B.. (2020). Chromatographic and computational lipophilicity assessment of novel antibiofilm agents. in Journal of Liquid Chromatography & Related Technologies
Taylor & Francis Inc.., 43(15-16), 615-623.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10826076.2020.1777154
Krmar J, Protić A, Đajić N, Zečević M, Otašević B. Chromatographic and computational lipophilicity assessment of novel antibiofilm agents. in Journal of Liquid Chromatography & Related Technologies. 2020;43(15-16):615-623.
doi:10.1080/10826076.2020.1777154 .
Krmar, Jovana, Protić, Ana, Đajić, Nevena, Zečević, Mira, Otašević, Biljana, "Chromatographic and computational lipophilicity assessment of novel antibiofilm agents" in Journal of Liquid Chromatography & Related Technologies, 43, no. 15-16 (2020):615-623,
https://doi.org/10.1080/10826076.2020.1777154 . .

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About FarFaR - Pharmacy Repository | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB
 

 

All of DSpaceCommunitiesAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis institutionAuthorsTitlesSubjects

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About FarFaR - Pharmacy Repository | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB